<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tailor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alifewortheating.com/nyc/tailor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alifewortheating.com/nyc/tailor/</link>
	<description>New York Perspectives on International Cuisine</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob gaj</title>
		<link>http://www.alifewortheating.com/nyc/tailor/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>bob gaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alifewortheating.com/nyc/tailor/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>i posted a review of tailor on chowhound in mid september   - a friend and i went and were blown away.  we had 9 dishes between us, but the odd part is, we had only 4 of the dishes you had.  went a la carte, and our faves were the crab, snapper, pork belly, char and mustard ice cream (which you didn't like).

and i know the duck wasn't a great dish, because he loves duck and thought it plain. (i didn't like it).

if you can go back, go for the salty side.  with the exception of the foie gras, i didn't find them to be 'sweet' so much as complementary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i posted a review of tailor on chowhound in mid september   - a friend and i went and were blown away.  we had 9 dishes between us, but the odd part is, we had only 4 of the dishes you had.  went a la carte, and our faves were the crab, snapper, pork belly, char and mustard ice cream (which you didn&#8217;t like).</p>
<p>and i know the duck wasn&#8217;t a great dish, because he loves duck and thought it plain. (i didn&#8217;t like it).</p>
<p>if you can go back, go for the salty side.  with the exception of the foie gras, i didn&#8217;t find them to be &#8217;sweet&#8217; so much as complementary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
